The Clyson family trip to Antigua last March was a redo of sorts. They’d already cancelled one trip to Mexico due to COVID-19 concerns and restrictions.
With two teenagers in tow, Rob and Kathleen Anne Clyson of Kitchener, Ont., knew it might be the last time they’d be able to get the whole clan on a plane at the same time.
Kathleen Anne says the family’s first trip in three years was exactly what they’d hoped.
“The resort was beautiful. The beach was beautiful. It was a nice, relaxing, family time,” she told Go Public.
That is, until five days in when they, along with all other air passengers, had to take a rapid COVID test to be allowed to fly home.
They all passed, except Rob.
He had only mild symptoms, but the family vacation ground to a halt.
While the rest of the family had to stay at the resort, distanced from other guests, Rob was required to isolate in his room, and would miss their return flight.
It cost $1,050 US to keep him in an Antigua hotel room for three nights and $627.60 Cdn for a separate flight home.
Luckily, Kathleen Anne thought, they had plenty of travel insurance.
In addition to COVID emergency insurance — included in their Sunwing vacation package — she also paid for trip cancellation and interruption coverage. All policies were with Manulife.
“It was just peace of mind booking it. I mean, as far as I was aware, there was no other insurance I could have bought that would have protected us,” she said.
The Clysons’ travel agent had even called Sunwing before the family departed to ensure the COVID package covered any isolation expenses.
The agent says she was assured it did.
Kathleen Anne recalls getting more assurances when she opened a claim.
“I called Manulife and the Sunwing rep. They said, ‘Don’t worry, we’ll make sure he’s well taken care of. You don’t have anything to worry about.’ So we packed up everything and left Rob with what he needed,'” she said.
The Clysons expected their interruption insurance to cover the two days of vacation that were derailed by Rob’s COVID test, and for his hotel stay and flight to be covered by the COVID insurance.
She thought leaving her husband by himself, in a hotel room, feeling under the weather, would be the worst of it.
“It was awful. It’s the unknown,” she said.
We did everything we thought that was right. We planned it.— Kathleen Anne Clyson
But the claim was denied because — according to both Manulife and the travel agent — Rob hadn’t needed or sought “medical treatment.”
In other words, because Rob didn’t get sick enough to warrant a hospital visit.
But that rejection appears to be in direct conflict with the fine print in Manulife’s COVID-19 policy, which says “treatment” includes “prescribed medication, investigative testing and surgery.”
Scott Stanley, a Vancouver personal injury lawyer and insurance specialist, calls Manulife’s rejection a “bad denial.”
He says the coverage is clear. “This is actually one of the rare instances when the insurance policy is actually pretty easy to read, pretty easy to understand, and yet we have a denial coming from it,” he said.
Stanley’s opinion is that the denial was a breach of contract.
“It’s pretty obvious that this is a claim that falls within the four corners of the policy. It’s one that should be paid out and covered, and it’s really not dependent upon how sick the person is.”
After Go Public got involved, Manulife changed course. The Clysons were reimbursed $627 Cdn for Rob’s flight…
Read More: Travel insurance giant refuses payout, claiming Ontario man’s COVID not severe