WASHINGTON, May 3 (Reuters) – During his 16 years on the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Samuel Alito has forged a reputation as a staunch conservative on a range of issues, opposing abortion and LGBT rights and supporting religious liberty and gun rights.
Alito, the 72-year-old author of a leaked draft opinion in a major abortion case from Mississippi that would overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing the procedure nationwide, was sworn in on Jan. 31, 2006.
He was appointed by Republican former President George W. Bush to replace the court’s first woman justice, Sandra Day O’Connor. read more
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
He became the nominee only after Bush’s first choice, his White House counsel Harriet Miers, withdrew amid an uproar from conservatives who among other things feared she was not sufficiently opposed to abortion rights.
Bush then turned to Alito, whose conservative record as a federal appellate judge prompted Democrats to mount a campaign against him in the U.S. Senate.
In the end, the Senate voted to confirm him 58-42 – a vote touted at the time as an important victory for conservatives as they sought to send the court on a rightward course. The court now has a 6-3 conservative majority, with Alito and Clarence Thomas, appointed by Bush’s father in 1991, considered its two most conservative justices.
Alito found himself in the minority in major Supreme Court rulings in recent years buttressing abortion rights.
The court in 2016, on a 5-3 vote, struck down a Republican-backed Texas law that sought to impose restrictions on clinics and doctors who perform abortions, provisions that had caused some clinics to close. In 2020, on a 5-4 vote, it struck down a Republican-backed Louisiana law with similar physician restrictions.
In his dissent in the Louisiana case, Alito wrote that “the abortion right recognized in this court’s decisions is used like a bulldozer to flatten legal rules that stand in the way.”
“Today’s decision claims new victims,” Alito added in the 2020 case. “The divided majority cannot agree on what the abortion right requires, but it nevertheless strikes down a Louisiana law … that the legislature enacted for the asserted purpose of protecting women’s health.”
The Texas and Louisiana rulings invalidated state abortion restrictions because they ran afoul of Roe v. Wade, which recognized a woman’s constitutional right to terminate her pregnancy, and a subsequent 1992 ruling reaffirming Roe.
During oral arguments last December in the Mississippi case, Alito was among the conservative justices who played down the notion that the court must be careful in overturning its own precedents.
“So there are circumstances in which a decision … must be overruled simply because it was egregiously wrong at the moment it was decided,” Alito said during the arguments. read more
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito wrote in the Mississippi draft opinion dated Feb. 10, according to Politico, which posted a copy online. The court is due to issue its ruling by the end of June.
Alito authored a major 2014 ruling, a 5-4 decision, that touched upon religious liberty, corporate rights and then-President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law.
Alito wrote that Christian-owned Hobby Lobby Stores Ltd could mount a religious objection to an Obamacare provision requiring that health insurance provided by employers cover women’s birth control.
Alito defended the idea that privately owned corporations could have religious objections, noting that protecting the rights of corporations “protects the religious liberty of the humans who own and control those companies.”
When the court in 2021 rejected a Republican bid to invalidate Obamacare, preserving it for the third…
Read More: Samuel Alito has been staunch conservative on U.S. Supreme Court